Update abstract syntax to account for datatyped literals
2002-09-06#4 jjc review material thus far on specifics of rdfs:Datatype,
rdfs:Literal and the abstract syntax of literals and produce a proposal for
wording in the Abs. Syntax document.
Reviewing
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Aug/0111.html
With apologies to the doc editors if they feel this is micromanaging, I
suggest that broadly:
1.1 What is datatyping -> concepts
1.2 desiderata -> concepts 2.2
2.1 rdfs:Datatype -> schema
2.2 datatype mapping -> concepts
2.3 type literal -> concepts
3. designation of ... -> syntax
3.1 global datatyping -> schema
3.2 datatype clashes -> schema
4. model theory -> ho hum, lets put that in test cases.
ok maybe not. MT doc then.
5. schema -> schema
6.1 not sure
6.2 examples -> primer + other docs at editors discretion
Also needed:
n-triples representation
test cases
This suggests further actions:
Graham or Jeremy update concepts doc to cover 1.1, 1.2, 2.2, 2.3
Danbri or Guha update schema to cover 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 5
Pat update model theory to cover 4
DaveB update n-triples (depends on completion of 2002-09-06#4)
?? prepare datatypes test cases
See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0125.html
[GK] Brian's note describing proposed distribution of the datatyped literal material among working group documents.
[GK] Working group accepted proposal. Abstract Syntax is Jeremy's expertise.
See: http://www-nrc.nokia.com/sw/rdf-datatyping.html
The datatyping document whose contents are to be incorporated.
See: http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-concepts/2002-10-25/rdf-concepts.html
This document release contains a reworking of the datatyping and abstract syntax to incorporate this material.
There is still some discussion about how to deal with language tags.See: http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-concepts-20021108/
Material incorporated into to publicly accessible document.