Issue name: 013-Various

Review comments posted by TimBL

Raised by:

Tim Berners-Lee

Raised on:

2002-08-18

Raised in message:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0092.html

Target document section reference(s):

http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-concepts-20020829/

Status:

Closed

Last updated:

2002-11-18

Owner:

Jeremy Carroll

Details

See: http://www.w3.org/2002/07/29-rdfcadm-tbl.html.

History

2002-08-18: Raised

See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0092.html

See: http://www.w3.org/2002/07/29-rdfcadm-tbl.html

Personal comments posted as marked-up copy of document. These comments cover all aspects of the document. We need to review more closely to determine what changes are called for.

2002-09-16: Comment

See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JulSep/0183.html

Additional comment here about assertion. In particular, the distinguished role of the predicate is noted. Discuss.

2002-09-30: Response

See: 008-InteractionUnclear.html

Other than the comments concerning section 3, most of the points raised have been worked into the reworking for issue 008-InteractionUnclear.

Specific point addressed separately: section 2.4.2, denotation of URIs, change made as requested.

Specific point not addressed in this version: bNodes for arc labels (however desirable, are not in the current version of RDF).

2002-09-30: Assigned

Comments on section 3 to be addressed by JJC.

2002-10-25: QueryClosed

See: http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-concepts/2002-10-25/rdf-concepts.html

Reworked material incorporated into to publicly accessible document.

2002-11-18: Closed

See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002OctDec/0130.html

Citation is Jeremy's response to comments on syntax. Together with earlier rework, this addresses all points raised.