Issue name: 027-SyntaxVarious

BWM various comments (syntax)

Raised by:

Brian McBride

Raised on:

2002-10-29

Raised in message:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0456.html

Target document section reference(s):

http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-concepts/2002-10-26/rdf-concepts.html

Status:

Closed

Last updated:

2002-11-29

Owner:

Jeremy Carroll

Details

I've done a pass through the whole document.  There is now some purple text
to indicate technical issues, though not a lot and quite a lot more green text.

[and from an earlier message...]

I attach a marked up copy of the concepts doc containing a lot of green
ink.  The good news is that its green which makes it stylistic rather than
substantive comment.  The bad news is that there is a lot of it.

History

2002-10-29: Raised

See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0456.html

See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/att-0456/01-rdf-concepts.html

Various stylistic comments. This issue is raised to include comments addressed to sections 3, 4 and 5.1.

2002-10-29: Assigned

This issue is raised to include comments addressed to the syntax and charmod issues.

2002-11-26: Closed

See: http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/tmp/rdfc/

Material incorporated into to next publicly accessible document.

We're still working on refining the URI character escaping text.