RDF Concepts and Abstract Syntax - issues

Prepared by: Graham Klyne

List of issues and current status for the document Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Data Model working draft.

Document information

Document identifier:
RDF-Concepts
Document title:
RDF Concepts and Abstract Data Model
Document URI:
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/
Document editor(s):
Graham Klyne
Jeremy Carroll

The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a data format for representing metadata about Web resources, and other information. This document defines the abstract graph syntax on which RDF is based, and which serves to link its XML serialization to its formal semantics. It also describes some other technical aspects of RDF that do not fall under the topics of formal semantics, XML serialization syntax or RDF schema and vocabulary definitions (which are each covered by a separate document in this series). These include: discussion of design goals, meaning of RDF documents, key concepts, character normalization and handling of URI references.

Document history

2002-08-29: W3CWorkingDraft

See: http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-rdf-concepts-20020829/

First official working draft of document.

Issue list

Issue name

By

Description

Owner

Status

Date

001-Editorial PatS Editorial comments GK Closed 2002-10-25
002-InconsistentAssertions PFPS Inconsistent assertions incompatible with MT GK Closed 2002-10-25
003-ModelTheory JE Problems with introduction to model theory GK Closed 2002-10-25
004-MultiGraph JE Multi graph is not adequately explained JJC Closed 2002-09-10
005-Editorial-Concepts MM Editorial comments about concept sections GK Closed 2002-10-25
006-Editorial-Syntax MM Editorial comments about syntax section JJC Closed 2002-11-18
007-Meaning-machinery PFPS Comments on RDF meaning and machinery GK Closed 2002-10-25
008-InteractionUnclear DER Interaction between social and formal meanings is unclear GK Closed 2002-10-25
009-DatatypingSyntax RDFcore Update abstract syntax to account for datatyped literals JJC Closed 2002-11-08
010-DatatypingConcepts RDFcore Incorporate material on datatyping and typed literals GK Closed 2002-10-25
011-DatatypingAcknowledgement RDFcore Include appropriate recogition to authors of datatyping draft GK Closed 2002-10-25
012-AssertionConflictingUse FrankM Conflicting use of the term 'assertion' GK Closed 2002-10-25
013-Various TimBL Review comments posted by TimBL JJC Closed 2002-11-18
014-SharedMeaning GK Shared meaning land grab GK Closed 2002-10-25
015-UntypedLiteralsUntidy GK Untyped literals are untidy GK Closed 2002-11-08
016-NodeLabels PFPS Description of blank and labelled nodes JJC Closed 2002-11-18
017-DefiningURIMeaning DanC How URI meaning is defined GK Closed 2002-11-08
018-ExampleDomains DanC Domain names in examples don't follow style rules GK Closed 2002-11-08
019-TypoLeball PatH New verb leballing? GK Closed 2002-10-25
020-BlankNodes DaveB No discussion of blank nodes GK Closed 2002-11-08
021-MeaningOfURIRefs SH Meaning of URI Refs GK Closed 2002-10-29
022-SocialMeaning PFPS Social meaning undermines semantic web GK Closed 2002-10-29
023-SyntaxEquality PFPS No sense to define equality on literals JJC Closed 2002-11-18
024-Various PFPS Model theory, examples, inference GK Closed 2002-11-29
025-DatatypeIncompatibility PFPS Datatype incompatibility with XML schema GK Closed 2002-11-29
026-ConceptsVarious BWM BWM various comments (concepts) GK Closed 2002-11-08
027-SyntaxVarious BWM BWM various comments (syntax) JJC Closed 2002-11-29
028-RetrievableURIDenotations FrankM Document says too much about the denotation of retrievable URIs GK Closed 2002-11-08
029-DocumentTitle BWM Proposed change of document title GK Closed 2002-11-26
030-VariousDanC DanC Various comments from DanC GK Closed 2002-11-08
031-ReferenceLinks GK Reference links need updating GK Waiting 2002-11-26
032-XMLWrapperNotNeeded PP No need for XML literal wrapper JJC Postponed 2002-11-26
033-DefineEntailment SP Entailment is not adequately defined GK Waiting 2002-11-26
034-DocumentRetrieval RS Does interpretation of fragment require document retrieval? GK Waiting 2002-11-29