RDF Concepts

Assigned

  PFPS, "Social Meaning and RDF"

» See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0192.html
» See also: Jim Hendler, "Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents"
» See also: Bijan Parsia, "Section 4 should be struck"

• Earlier message cited
• Pat responds
• Peter Crowther adds voice
• My response
• Another response
• Assigned: Pfps-14, "Meaning of RDF tokens"
• Aaron, HTTP 404 comment
• Pat,. another comment
• Jeremy comment
• PFPS follow-up
• Pat's analysis
• Brian's summary
• More from Pat
• IRC chatlogs
• DanBri comment
• TimBL comment
• Proposed to strike text
• Comment from HP patent policy rep
• Close?

Earlier message cited

» See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002OctDec/0297.html

Pat responds

» See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0197.html

Peter Crowther adds voice

» See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0270.html

My response

» See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0360.html

Another response

» See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0357.html

Assigned: Pfps-14, "Meaning of RDF tokens"

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0382.html

Aaron, HTTP 404 comment

» See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0265.html

Pat,. another comment

» See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0162.html

Jeremy comment

» See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0166.html

PFPS follow-up

» See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0407.html

Pat's analysis

» See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0164.html

• Bijan response
  Even if it is the *intended* mode, so? The thing about language, specs, etc. is that intentions (particularly of a relatively small body of folks) don't dominate. We should *expend* that unintended use will be the dominant use. Or, at least, we should be prepared for that.

  
  

  
  » See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0423.html
   

Brian's summary

» See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0212.html

More from Pat

» See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0226.html

IRC chatlogs

» See document: http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2003-02-26.html#T20-31-27

DanBri comment

A reasonable expectation, and one that indicates something we've not really explicitly articulated: that we (well, maybe 'we') believe as our guiding fiction that class and property terms have a meaning that is independent of the languages (html, rdfs, owl, n3, ...) that we use to try to characterise that meaning. When all goes well, those varying characterisations are in sync. When things go badly (discuss...:)

TimBL comment

This relates to DanBri's comment.

One meaning/many definitions.

Proposed to strike text

Comment from HP patent policy rep

» See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0043.html

Close?

» See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0510.html

• Pfps response
  » See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0511.html