RDF Concepts

bullet1 Assigned

bullet2 Interesting   PFPS, "Social Meaning and RDF"

See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0192.html
See also: Jim Hendler, "Web Ontology Working Group Consensus Review of RDF Core documents"
See also: Bijan Parsia, "Section 4 should be struck"

bullet3 Earlier message cited

See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002OctDec/0297.html

bullet3 Pat responds

See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0197.html

bullet3 Peter Crowther adds voice

See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0270.html

bullet3 My response

See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0360.html

bullet3 Another response

See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0357.html

bullet3 Assigned: Pfps-14, "Meaning of RDF tokens"

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0382.html


See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0290.html

bullet3 Aaron, HTTP 404 comment

See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0265.html

bullet3 Pat,. another comment

See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0162.html

bullet3 Jeremy comment

See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0166.html

bullet3 PFPS follow-up

See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0407.html

bullet3 Pat's analysis

See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0164.html

  • Bijan response
    Even if it is the *intended* mode, so? The thing about language, specs, etc. is that intentions (particularly of a relatively small body of folks) don't dominate. We should *expend* that unintended use will be the dominant use. Or, at least, we should be prepared for that.



    See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0423.html
     

bullet3 Brian's summary

See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0212.html

bullet3 More from Pat

See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0226.html

bullet3 IRC chatlogs

See document: http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2003-02-26.html#T20-31-27

bullet3 DanBri comment

A reasonable expectation, and one that indicates something we've not really explicitly articulated: that we (well, maybe 'we') believe as our guiding fiction that class and property terms have a meaning that is independent of the languages (html, rdfs, owl, n3, ...) that we use to try to characterise that meaning. When all goes well, those varying characterisations are in sync. When things go badly (discuss...:)


See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0250.html

bullet3 TimBL comment

This relates to DanBri's comment.

One meaning/many definitions.


See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0004.html

bullet3 Proposed to strike text

bullet3 Comment from HP patent policy rep

See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0043.html

bullet3 Close?

See document: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0510.html